Referee Review
Why was this decision made?
See the key points from a referee’s perspective
Show explanation
Referee Review
Why was this decision made?
See the key points from a referee’s perspective
Show explanationHow the footage and Laws apply
Whether the slide was a fair challenge is the central question here, and this was an extremely difficult incident to judge. In the footage, the defending player from Shimizu slides towards the ball, but appears to make contact with the left leg of the Tokyo Verdy attacking player before touching the ball. At the same time, the attacking player also appears to put their left leg out towards the defender, blocking their path. The referee on the field judged this split-second entanglement to be a foul and awarded a penalty kick. The contact is close enough that an offence by either player could be argued, and it is a highly demanding decision that generated considerable debate.
Relevant Laws
Law 12 - Fouls and Misconduct
Official references
Check the wording of the Laws
The links above lead to official IFAB and JFA resources. The application of the Laws to this incident is the author’s analysis and is not an official view of IFAB, JFA or the competition organiser.
Want to test your understanding of this decision?
Build confidence with more Laws of the Game questions in the app.
Try more questions in the appRelated Scenes
[Penalty Kick] The referee's positioning, judging a sliding tackle inside the penalty area from close range | 2026/27 J2 League Matchweek 4 RB Omiya Ardija vs Shonan Bellmare
[No Foul / VAR Intervention] An on-field review of contact between a goalkeeper and an attacking player, with no offence given | 2025 J1 League Matchweek 26 Sanfrecce Hiroshima vs Gamba Osaka